critique

Droid Does Quite Well

Generally when I write my critiques, I have an unconventional way of writing them. I like to point out the faults and grevances first before pointing out the praise, features, and benefits. This way, when someone finishes reading the article they can think postively about the thing that I wrote about. This can work the opposite way if you list the postive first and the negative second.

I’ve had my Motorola Droid for nearly a week now. Though it is a good phone it is not without grevances.

First, there is the grevances with Verizon. The usage of mail in rebates is so last century. The fact that I have to pay an extra $100 to get that $100 back is BS. The concept of the rebate system seems to be on the idea that people are lazy and that they will not take the effort to photocopy a sales recept (easily done at the workplace, local library, Kinkos, or if you are lucky to have an open top printer/scanner). I certainly wasn’t going to go to Sam’s to pay $184 for a $199 phone that is worth paying an extra $8 for an insurance policy. It also would have been nice if Verizon would have created a printout of what the bill would look like. Though service will likely be near $100/month, there are a few things that can be done to reduce the cost of service. When I find out, I’ll be sure to write about it.

Next, their is the grevances with Motorola. I was suprised to here that the Droid was Motorola’s Hail Mary Pass in that hearing things like Motorola has been putting out some bad phones over the years. The Droid is a good phone….but Motorola wasn’t truthful in reporting the SAR rating of the phone. While Motorola told the FCC that it had an SAR rating of 0.89 W/kg (body) and 1.10 W/kg (head), the manual for the Droid has different values. Like 1.5 W/kg (body) and 1.49 W/kg (head). Of course, it is not like there is someone who keeps track of these things, right? On the other hand, I did disable the GPS on the phone, which probably explains why I don’t need to recharge the thing every four hours. GPS is a nice feature to work with mapping applications, but it can be a real battery drainer and privacy invader.

Which brings me to the final set of grevances that I have with Google. Google has played a big part in the Android Operating system development. It was kind of a let down that the applications I though Google had availble to use Google’s services weren’t there, or were so much better if used in the Internet browser than on the phone. Sure, you have Google Maps (which is good), Google Calendar (also good), and Gmail (which could use an upgrade), but Google does not have any applications for Tasks, Notes, or Docs. These applications are available for iPhone from Google, but Android users, no matter which phone you are using, will need to go to the Internet for that.

Seeing as how the Android operating system now brings Google applications to a mobile device, one can’t help but wonder if the guy at Google who decided to discontinue Google Notebook isn’t kicking himself right now. Notebook would have been a great app for Android, and the fact that it was discontinued is a foolish mistake. It would be like Microsoft removing Notepad because you have Word. Hopefully, someone will reinstate this service so that moble users can jot down notes.

The Android Market deserves both praise and criticism.

If anyone is not aware of the Anonymous hacker group, you should probably know that these guys mean business even in their quirky unorthodox ways. Anonymous is fickle. To either laud or jeer them would be hazardous to one’s online reputation. However, I find their motives of dealing soundboards in the Android Market (under the guise of “Onymous Heroes”) to be conspicuous. While it is great that the Android has many free appications to try out (although It would be nice to see a few more from Google and the Android group), the fact that one of the most stand-alone-complex group might not be so obvious to many users is a little concerning but at the same time a reminder that not everyone is creating programs in the Market (or App Store for that matter) with good intentions. That is, other groups (not like Anonymous) could have their own applications on the market to do some bad things. It is sort of like a reminder by them to say “hey watch your back” or taking advice from a theif on how to better safeguard your home from intrusion. On the other hand, the fact that no one is really keeping an eye on the Market to weed out programs that can be potential secuirty threats should make Android users wary of who the download their software from.

Reguardless, I do have plans on writing many reviews in the future about Android Apps. I would also like to develop some of them. I probably should put more effort into writing things in Java, to which that is what brings me to the upside of this review.

The Android operating system is Linux based, but many of the programs are written in Java. Perhaps I had alot of bad experiences with Java (as I don’t even use Java when browsing the Internet as the processes will keep on running), but the performance of Java on the Android is remarkable! Back when I had a Motorola RAZR, Java was unplesant. Palm couldn’t use Java work a dan on the Treo. But Android, has pretty much saved Java from being just another legacy language. Android doesn’t use the Java 2 SE or ME standards, which probably explains why Android programs are so fluid.

As stated earlier, the security flaws of the Android operating system is not with the operating sysetem itself, but with programs from some shady individuals selling their wares on the Market. However, there are gems among the junk. Where Palm Treo didn’t have the random number generation to develop a proper encryption key to run things like SSH and IRC (or battery life), the Android operating system does. Security is also one of the main goals of the Android operating system. If anything bad happens to the phone because of a program, Google will know about it. So basically, security is very good on the phone.

The Droid has a beautiful and sharp 16:9 screen. Despite the criticism by many critics about the camera, I think they seem to forget that the camera has two flashes on it. And why is everyone complaining about the 5 megapixel camera? Sure, you have to hold down the picture button to take a photo, but 5 megapixels is a sharp good of not great quality camera. (Perhaps my review of digital cameras is short sighted, then again, I don’t exactly have $700 at the moment to go out and buy the latest Nikon camera on the market. So in my opinion, 5 MP is good.)

Another thing the critics have been ripping on is the audio. Perhaps it is the foolish assumption that because a phone has a speakerphone on it that it can be used as a radio. Well…yes and no. Like just about all other smartphones, you will need to use headphones or an audio adaptor that plugs into your car stereo or home audio equipment. With a 3.5mm headphone jack, any set of headphones can be plugged into the Droid. The iPhone, much like my previous phone which was a Palm Treo, does not have a 3.5mm headphone jack. Instead, iPhone users need to use an adaptor, which in my previous experience of using audio adaptors for headphones, is an unplesant experience as it makes listening to music impossible afte a while. The Droid, like its competitor the Palm Pre, has a 3.5mm jack as opposed with the G1 that has no jack (USB audio only has one purpose: SKYPE!).

Droid does streaming audio much like the iPhone. If there is one Application I can recommend right now, it is imeem Moble. Streaming audio has evolved over the years. Just remember when you do streaming audido, do it where you can get WiFi. Otherwise, don’t forget to bring your music collection with you. (Remember: “unlimited” on the 3G network, no matter which telecom you use, means 5GB.)

So to call the iPhone better because “it has 100,000 apps” and that “it is more popular” is clearly a sign that the critics are not interested in what is new or what is better, just what is cool. Remember that next time when you try to listen to music on your iPhone but can’t because your headphones sound awful because you need to use an adaptor. Remember that when you can’t swap batteries, run multiple applications, take night shots with the camera, or make a phonecall without having to deal with the Jack-In-The-Box-speaker-quality sound.

The Droid Does but Android still needs development.

Tags: , , , ,

Bing: The TERRIBLE decision making search engine

As proof that someone at Microsoft has yet to fix the Y2K bug on their computer, I submit to you these two pictures doing a search query of things that are not Windows from BlackKaiser at Fark.com

Exhibt A: Seems about right

Exhibt A: Seems about right


What is wrong with this picture?

What is wrong with this picture?


After seeing these photos, and testing the searches myself, the pictures are in deed valid.
As an added bonus, I conducted the same search on Ask.com and Yahoo!. Ask’s results were more identical to Google’s as were Yahoo!’s results.
For your information, the Algorithm killed Jeeves.

For your information, the Algorithm killed Jeeves.


Could you imagine what this search would look like if Microsoft owned Yahoo!?

Could you imagine what this search would look like if Microsoft owned Yahoo!?

Strangly enough, this does not happen when you search “Apple”, “Macintosh”, or “Firefox. (Which I was surprised that Bing didn’t try to push Internet Explorer, probably because MSIE is still a train wreck compared to Firefox.) It does happen when searching “IBM” (Google finds the “IBM Layoffs”, Bing does not), “SUN Microsystems” (Google finds layoffs there, Bing pretends it doesn’t exist), “Oracle” (Google finds “Oracle buys MySQL”, Bing doesn’t again). Yahoo kept bringing up The Philipines on a couple of searches. Ask seemed to side with Google mostly.

As with ANY search engine, you should NEVER let it make decisions for you. Only YOU can decide what is right. You can even disagree with this article.

Tags:

Monday, June 8th, 2009 critique, techcos No Comments

Pixlr: The Photoshop Killr

The first time I bought a copy of Adobe Photoshop it was Adobe Photoshop Elements. Even at student software pricing, this piece of software I bought in 2003 set me back about $100 and by 2004 became of no use to me especially after purchasing Ulead GIF Animator (which by 2004 also became of no use to me). By 2006, I was enfachuated with the GIMP (GNU Image Manipulation Editor). For a breif instance, I also liked OpenOffice.org Draw until it was recoded, then recoded again, then recoded again. (Why screw with something that was fine to begin with?!)

So now, all my raster work is done with the GIMP, and all my vectoring done using Inkscape (though at times I sometimes fall back to regular code by hand, which for Scalable Vector Graphics is a must know.)
I want to get into Blender, POV-Ray and BRL-CAD, but they don’t have the simple interface that AutoCAD has where you can either use mouse commands or command-line. On top of that, I don’t really have the skills of a full fledge graphics designer, nor should I need those skills to express my ideas. Pad and paper can only go so far though. Blender’s Python interface got me hooked on Python which as it turns out Python also supports OpenGL to a certain degree.

While none of these compare to the simplicity of ClarisWorks Draw program from back in the 1990s that I used during my teen years, the GIMP and Inkscape have become the de facto open source graphics programs. Though I would like to see Blender become more intuitive with people who aren’t graphics desingers.

But I’m not hear to blog about that today. Today’s blog is about Pixlr. The only downside with Pixlr is that it is in Flash. Where as we’ve seen Writely (now Google Docs) become popular and set of a trend of SaaS (Software as a Service) programs back in 2007. Most liked are the Google Calendar which I wish was around years earlier when at the time I was fiddling around with XHTML div elements. Clearly with software like WordPress, much of the coding has been taken care of.

Pixlr’s design is very much like Adobe Photoshop. It has a desktop. It has a task bar. It has menu bars and tool bars and modules that tell you the history of your actions as well as other information. What it lacks is a ruler and guildlines. These are probably things on the Pixlr developer todo list. But most importantly, what should be on there list is to develop a program like this without Flash. Otherwise, the next thing they’ll make is a version of Flash MX inside a Flash program.

Despite these drawbacks, there is a bright future for Pixlr up until the Adobe folks move in with either a lawsuit or plans to purchase the company.

If Pixlr wants to survive, it should develop itself to be different from Adobe…BETTER THAN ADOBE!

Photoshop, to my knowledge, still does not have GIF animation features. The GIMP does, but the GIMP does have layer grouping like Adobe. And there still is no Flash-MX-like program for Linux, though SaaS could change that.

Another set of online multimedia tools include Hobnox’s Noxtools which include Audiotool (create electronic music) and Livetool (video editing). Again, these a Flash-based SaaS programs.

But Mozilla is warning that Adobe (and rival Microsoft) have hidden agendas with Flash and Silverlight. Clearly Silverlight is a gaudy attempt by Microsoft to take a stab at Flash’s 98% share of the market. (Where’d Java Go? Oh! That’s right. No body uses Java anymore except for cellphones and businesses. Sorry, SUN. But Oracle isn’t going to save you.)

The concept of moving away from Flash and Silverlight has been on the table. Dailymotion recently mentioned adding features in HTML5 that allow for video playback without Flash. The W3C is considering such features in HTML5.

But the future is still slow to develop at this time. But hopefully it will be the future soon.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, June 5th, 2009 Software, audio, critique, graphics, music No Comments

I-49 Blues May Be Due to Arkansas

Today I’ve decided to write a critque about a few websites. Specifically those involved with a highway development project occuring on the other side of the state. It may seems silly to critique a website in such a category for most people, but professionally, it is a serious business.

Apperance and presentation are about as important as the information and detail that is on a website. Today’s case for example is important because it involves accessing information about a multi-billion dollar project between three states using the stimulus money allocated by President Barack Obama through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

I recently picked up some highway development information from the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) about upgrading most of US Highway 71 in Western Missouri to become part of Interstate 49. The project has been inevidable for about ten years it seems, though Springfield seems more of a city to construct a new Interstate than Joplin. But since US-71 goes through Joplin, I-49 is destine to run along counties near the Missouri-Kansas border.

Louisianna, where I-49 started has been eagerly working with the Lousianna Department of Transportation and Development (LaDOTD), to push I-49 south toward Lafayette, Louisianna, and north of Shreveport towards the Arkansas state line.

The Missouri upgrade South of Joplin has its sights set for I-540 in Bentonville in the future. Furthermore, roads ending with the numbers 71 and 49 between Shreveport and Texarkana are destine to connect.

There is just one problem: Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department (AHTD).

If you click on the links for MoDOT and LaDOTD, then click on the AHTD website, you see that the Missouri and Lousianna websites are modern and contain information about the construction of I-49. Where as Arkansas’s website looks like something out of an old AOL for Dummies book you would find at a garage sale. It’s embarassing. The guy who runs the AHTD website should be embarrassed.

Literally every state that borders Arkansas has a better website for their Department of Transportation. With no information as to where Arkansas’s share of Recovery Act money is going, the future of I-49 is unclear. A link to a PDF showing the budgetting information is unacceptable as is a Word document for the Final Statewide Transportation Improvement Program. Why they are not written in HTML, especially the Word Document, is inexcusable.

Arkansas should spend part of their stimulus package money on hiring a web development team.

If you are going to be building a multi-billion dollar project, get serious about transparency!

Tags:

Saturday, March 7th, 2009 critique No Comments
September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jul    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930