energy
Blue August
Elections are next week here in Missouri.
Expected turnout is predicted to be 24%, meaning that things like Proposition C, a last ditch effort by anti-Obama Missouri Republicans and Tea Partyers to kill the new health care system, will likely fail. Voting “yes” on Prop C is a lot like setting yourself up to apply for a Darwin Award. You may not have a condition that requires that your insurance company to pay for lifesaving treatment today, but if by chance your insurance provider feels the need to drop you like a bad habit because your cancer is a “pre-existing condition” (*ahem*Wellpoint/Anthem/Blue Cross Blue Shield*ahem*), then basically you have chosen to cull yourself from the heard. So, the smart thing to do would be to vote NO on Prop C!
I don’t like either Republican candidate for Missouri State Auditor. Tom Schweich donated $250 to Ed Martin last year! Being endorsed by John Ashcroft is also a good enough reason to abhor him. Meanwhile, Allan Icet isn’t any better. Icet put Joe the Plumber in his ads and tried to draw attention to the letter “T” in his name to highly his support for the Tea Party, Schweich became the lesser of two evils.Forget it! They both have Tea Party backers, and both equally thourghly suck. Until I remembered that Susan Montee, the incumbent, was running to keep her place as State Auditor. Hopefully, Montee will have a Hail Mary strategy against her two boisterous rivals. I haven’t seen any of her ads lately.
In the St. Louis area, expect Robyn Hamlin and Ed Martin (both Tea Party Republicans) to lose to William Lacy Clay and Russ Carnahan, respectively. Despite Clay’s recent support for the Riverview Casino Project (which should really be in Cape Girardeau, not near the serene wetlands of the Mississippi-Missouri River Confluence), Clay will likely keep his seat in the U.S. House of Representatives for District 1. Carnahan (like his sister Robin) will likely also succeed for District 2. Ed Martin is clearly in La-la-land, accusing President Obama of “removing religious freedoms”. Just about every religious group and civil liberties group has told Martin his Tin Foil Hat is on too tight.
The big campaign for the state of Missouri is for U.S. Senate. With Kit Bond retiring (hooray!), Roy Blunt and Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan are vying for the senate seat. Blunt, who like his son (former governor Matt Blunt, or as he’s known here as “Missouri’s Dubya”), is knee deep in corruption and lobbyists. Blunt’s second and current wife Abigail Perlman is a lobbyist for Kraft Foods. They married in 2003. Blunt has his own Political Action Group, the Rely on Your Beliefs Fund (ROYB Fund), spending more than $2 Million of which his contributors include Altria (L for Love, Mrs. Perlman), Enron (clearly before it imploded), Microsoft, and Jack Abramoff who is currently living in a halfway house after spending 70 months in Federal P.M.I.T.A. Prison.
In terms of general contributions, Monsanto, Peabody Energy, Goldman Sachs, Blue Cross/Blue Shield (pro-prop C), Devon Energy (Most money given out to ANYONE this year from their company: $10,000), Cheveron (In the top 5 recipients this year alone), Valero Energy (One of four senators who received at least $10,000 this year the most given out to anyone), Exxon Mobile (2nd most money donated THIS YEAR, #1 for the state of Missouri), BRITISH PETROLEUM!. 2nd most money received since records were compiled online ($12,500) and Kit Bond eclipses Blunt who out ranks John Ashcroft, Dick Gephardt, and Jim Talent).
If there is anyone who has his hand so covered in black muck this election it is Roy Blunt!
As for comparisons, checking Robin Carnahan, William Lacy Clay, Russ Carnahan, Susan Montee, and Claire McCaskill have nearly spotless records with most of their money coming in from labor unions. There are a couple of small smudges such as receiving donations from Ameren but their donations are pocket change compared to the Big Oil, Coal, and Natural Gas companies that have made Congressman Blunt and family very wealthy.
However, my biggest criticism of Democratic candidates is that they haven’t adverized themselves. I have yet to see Robin Carnahan, Russ Carnahan, Susan Montee, William Lacy Clay, or Anti-Prop C supporters invest in a massive media campaign like the fearmongers on the right have. Is it because we have a democratic president? Is it because we have democratic (in name only sadly) governor? Are they being over confident or underfunded? Or have the Dems driven people nuts with asking people for money? Find me a Democratic website where you don’t run into a splash page asking for a donation of $20 or more! I’d be interested in supporting say $5, but $20 is just too much for right now. Not unless I get a good looking T-shirt out of it.
Everyone is still broke. And the Republican candidates don’t seem to get that. They want things to be as they were on January 19, 2009 and they are willing to invest plenty of money to spread lies to no end, forgetting that the Internet is their Achilles heel. The republican still don’t get it, yet they are willing to burn down everything to prove their point and gain support.
A short list of technologies you could be using right now if it weren’t for the Apple Fanboys
It is no secret that I love my Motorola Droid, and that the number of Apple Fanboys out there will rebuke anything that is better than any iProduct because it doesn’t bear the Apple logo on it.
So, while the Fanboys bask in the glow of their latest underachieving iProduct (the iPad), here are a list of things that would be really cool right now that would be sold in the American market if Steve Jobs didn’t use the What’s New section of Popular Science magazine as toilet paper.
Despite my objections to devices such as the Amazon Kindle and Barnes and Noble Nook, these devices, can and will appeal to consumers more than any iProduct. The only improvement that would significantly defeat Apple from killing these devices is if some sort of Indiglo or Illuminator electroluminescent background were embedded into the background.
Other technologies such as electrowetting and rollability could be used.
Later this year, Lumus will release Lumusvision, a translucent head-mounted display (HMD) that sheds most of the stigmas that the Virtual Reality trend of the 1990s of the big, bulky, ugly, heavy, and geeky HMDs. While the HMD currently featured on the Lumus website still looks rather geeky, this can be modified, especially if a few eyeglass designers get involved.
Another thing iProduct Fanboys will not see is Flash. That $500 used to buy an iPad could have been better spent on an HP or Dell netbook or Tablet PC and still be able to watch videos on YouTube, run more than one application, and connect their USB devices to their computer.
Finally, as computing devices become smaller and more energy efficient, I strongly advocate adding some portable alternative energy system be embedded into the device to increase time between charges. Even if you don’t live in a high solar area, you can still power your device while it is hibernating during the day or running. The reason photovoltaic systems are not endorsed is because people expect a small panel to power a bunch of large industrial factories. Solar has been, and always will be, designed for the small scale unless there is a way to gather more photons but more importantly boost the current in a system.
The real problem with solar panels isn’t due to the lack of direct sunlight (which indirect light could work on some systems) or low voltage (solar panels can generate a good amount of voltage), but the low electrical current. A dilemma that I am personally trying to figure out.
As proof that solar can be a viable alternative for small scale electronics and devices such as netbooks, I’m going to attempt to try developing a system where I can reduce my energy consumption, increase my independence, and optimize performance.
Climate Change is still very, very real
Despite the leaked information this week by a few scientist stiffling dissent and doctoring data, the information that is now public does NOT prove that skeptics were right.
However, when the mainstream media, with corporate sponsors and ownership by large energy conglomorates or stock in the obsolete technology that is continuing to be used and wreck havoc not just on climate but on agriculture, property, maritime safety and physical well being.
Skeptics assume that because this data is now public, they now have proof that climate change caused by humans is a myth, but they are very, very wrong!
Even though there is scandel brewing over climate change brough on by the University of East Anglia, the fact that the leading scientists tried to slience decent and exagerate the truth, there are many other institutions in the world with their own independent research and data to prove that climate change is still very real and does not only threaten the environment but economic interests.
Many climate change skeptics deny the existance of climate change not because of ignorance but because they fear that if action is taken to curb climate change it will mean that government regulation will be imposed to reduce the amount of manufacturing thus driving down profits.
The fact that economic liberalism (often supported by conservative political parties) has already allowed free trade to move manufacturing to countries with lax environmental regulation or to punch exceptions into laws than make existing pollutors to be exempt from new environmental laws has not only contributed to environmental damage but agricultural disaster, economic recession, unemployment, and poverty.
The status quo believes that it is unsulated from these problems because they have the wealth to afford to establish themselves where it will effect them the least. The problem is that despite isolating themselves from the outside world, the outside will always find a way in.
So if skeptics believe that because they have released the quibble of a few scientists trying to cover up dissent that talks in Copenhagen will fail, the skeptics are wrong!
It should be noted that eariler this year, News International was caught hiring hackers to break into private telephone and compuyter systems to dig up private conversations and personal information then used the stollen data to sensationalize it senationalize news in tabloids owned by News International.
News International is the corporation in the United Kingdom controlled by Rupert Murdoch who also owns News Corp (Fox News, The Wall Street Journal, MySpace.com) in the United states as well as News Limited in Australia.
Murdoch’s senationalism and biased news coverage has invoked all sorts of anarchy for all the wrong reasons.
In the United State, Murdoch’s “Fixxed News” has destablized the Republican Party by forcing out moderate, center-right conservative supporters in order to cater to the Republican base and far-right. Because Republicans emphazies the values of ONLY their base while abandoning and expelling everybody else, the Republican party has lost control of the House of Representatives, the Senate, and the 2008 Presidential Election not to metion many state and general elections through out the country.
As if that weren’t enough, the base and the far-right then developed misguided protest in the form of the what is now the T.E.A. Party Movement which has polarized American politics. One of the many things people notice about the T.E.A. Party is that it is composed mostly by white upper class individuals who for nearly the past 25 years (complements of former president Ronald Regan) have gotten away with alot of deregulation that created a barrier between the upper class and the middle class and has constantly pushed the middle class into becoming part of the working poor or into poverty.
With the rise of the Internet, a growing resistance has developed. So much so that in 2008, America elected President Obama through a grass roots campaign and community organization efford.
While the base and the far-right claims it has developed their own “grass roots efforts”, the discovery of who is really part of their grass roots campaigns denotes that they are not grass roots and only used the name “grass roots” as a buzzword which also has liberal activists on the look out for other things like greenwashing, disinformation, and of course counterhacktivism.
The counterhacktivism this week is a sign that conservative base and far-right are desperate to keep the status quo, even as going as far as to make it appear that the real hactivists are throwing their support behind skepticism. Of course, the mainstream media doesn’t know the difference between counterhacktivism and hacktivism. So who takes the credit for revealing this e-mails at East Anglia? The hacktivists.
Don’t be surprise to see more attacks by counterhactivists on issues such as the National Healthcare, Network Neutrality, Alternative Energy, Unionization, and fighting against Telecom Immunity and Factory Farming.
It is up to the hacktivist to fight back against the corporate and neo-conservative counterhacktivists.
This is our world. We have to defend it!
Compainies firing workers to boost their corporate profits, executive bonuses
It is as if the executives in corporate America think we have “stupid” tatooed on our foreheads.
About a year ago, InBev bought Anheuser Busch to form AB InBev. InBev stated they woud save jobs, which they didn’t. InBev laid off workers while at the same time sheding Busch Theme Parks. And while beer sales are slumping and jobs are being cut, AB InBev reported they made a better profit this year.
But it is not just the world wide distributor of beer that has reported that they’ve made a better profit this year and that the guys on top get to keep their jobs and get a larger than average bonus this year while sacking workers. Citigroup, Bank of America, AIG, GM and Crystler, all reporting an increase in profit, while service, products, and employees all get cut out.
In other words, the guys on top save their own ass, and tell everyone else “your on your own”.
As unemployment spills over 10.2%, the rich get richer, the middle class is being pushed into the lower class, and the lower class have no where to go.
Chances are if you have graduated college in the past couple of years, you are unemployed or working in a low paying job. Although it may seem like the military looks like a way to make money, if you have no interest in fighting in combat or are not physically able to give the military 20 years of your time to serve your country, then DON’T! You can serve your country in other ways, but at this time thouse government agencies are not hiring anyone with a short resume.
It is quite clear that the country is run by a very small, wealthy minority. The private sector continues to show that at this current time, their only interest is to look out for themselves.
We see this when the best military in the world can’t get the manpower or functioning equipment they need to complete a war that has lasted for far too long. The president can send as may troops the generals need, but as long as the private sector sells the same weapons to our enemies as they do with our allies, the war continues at the expense of the people and the families that suffer. But it is no problem for the executives at the top that are double dealing. To them, War is money. The longer the war goes on, the more money they can take from the government.
We see this when not just manufacturing, but white collar work, is outsourced overseas. The free trade model has moved our jobs to China. America is not the only country where jobs are moving to China. Japan, Austraila, Europe, Canada, even Mexico have seen jobs move to China.
Ah, but now China wants total control over foreign patents. Foreign companies now must decide if they still want stay in China, where there is abundant cheap labor and laxed environmental regulations, or go back home an restart manufacturing here. If you are an coporate executive, you don’t care about ideas, labor issues, or the environment. Your interest is to sell whatever you can and build them as cheap as possible and still make a profit even if the product or service sucks.
The Chinese will soon be showing us the hubris of these executives.
Finally, to futher the madness of corporate America’s irrational behavior, there is the issue of healthcare. If your job can provide you with adequate private insurance, and the insurance company is not in the business of finding some way to prove that whatever is ailing you is benign, then more power to you.
However, for the rest of us, especially the unemployed, recently unempolyed, and those in poverty, we don’t have such good fortune to have a doctor on call who will actually look at what is wrong and not pretend there is nothing wrong because you have no medical coverage or the insurance company tells the doctor to ignore it.
It would be great to have a job. It would be great to have insurance. It would be great to let the capitalist system of government leave the private sector alone so that the private sector could do whatever it likes. However, we can’t. Not when people can’t tell the difference between consumerism and capitalism. Not when people can’t tell the difference between socialism and communism. Not when corporations distort the defintions of these words during a time when unemployment is high, wars seem everlasting, and a pandemic is infecting the world but the sick can’t see a doctor because they can’t afford it. And especially when corporations free themselves of being responble for any bad behavior they do.
When the capitalist system fails because it has perverted the idea that consumerism (in which people buy things) not capitalism (in which people save up for things) jumpstarts the economy, then defends this faux capitalism that only serve the people on the top by excluding everyone not just at the bottom but all people that are not at the top, then tells the people who have lost their jobs and benefits “don’t go to the big bad government” and “government run programs are bad and are socialism” (where they use socialism not as the intended word of a system serving the people, but as a synonym for communism), then continue to operate this system for a very long time, people will ultimately become stressed. They will comit crimes, unaware that it is OK to ask for assitance until it is too late. That if several people in the same predicimate can’t convince the government to help them because some corporate lobbyist made an exception to the rules or put in something to kill the bill to provide relief during a time of suffering and recession, they can do this instead of hurt other people.
The corporate system is based on greed and jealousy. Why should you suffer because you were fired so your employer could get a raise especially if you did a good job and didn’t have a poor performance record? Why should the next genereation of the workforce be paid less than there parents if they’ve recieved a better education and have worked to live a better life than their folks have?
We’ve been told that “hey, you shouldn’t pay you taxes” while at the same time accept the cost of rising fuel prices, the loss of alternatives when it comes to shopping, cheap breakable goods from big box stores, diminishing water, food, and environment quality, failing schools, high health cost, and small government, all so that small minority can preserve their way of life.
To call these feeling “raging against the machine” or to say “there is nothing you can do about it” and to actually do nothing about it endorses the continuity of the status quo, no mater who you vote for.
We have a great, intellegent leader as president right now. And everyone who has stalled or shotdown any of his plans to do something or to save jobs, lives, and property has done this because they have everything they need and people to provide it for them until suddenly they are themselves inconvienced either by their own family or someone they know needs something done. Suddenly, autism is a big deal because some senator or corporate excutive has a child with autism. Military spending becomes a big deal because someone’s best friend is joining the military. Automobile safe becomes a big issue because they were in a car accident recently. The environment becomes an issue because they suck at hunting or fishing and wonder where are all the wild critters they saw as a child.
Things shouldn’t be done because the lawmakers are affected by them. They should be done because at some point everyone is going to need something they want that the government can help them with, no strings attatched.
Yet, people feel threatened when the president gives a speech to school children. They feel threatened by his endorsement of public healthcare. They feel threatened that he might not provide more than enough or less than enough (in that they want the exact number, nothing more or less) troops to end our wars, apprehend terrorists, and secure our country. They feel threatened by fair trade, efficent cars, workers with benefits and insurance. They feel threatend because some uberliberal California law maker created a federal madate to preserve some turtles living in farmland that needs water for irrigation. (A more moderate liberal would have provided an alternative to support the farmers and the turtles…like rerouting where the water comes from.) And they feel threaten that they have to pay more on taxes which mathematics–which is NOT partisan–says they have to anyway.
And these people have hired voices to tell those without “don’t seek out, stay where you are!” And they are concerned that the country is falling apart.
If the healthcare bill fails in the Senate–or is thwarted by some partisan action to preserve the status quo–expect a new group of individuals to come out of the wood work to take down the fearmongers that preserve the stats quo. Because after a while, people will realizes that yes they have had enough and it is not the fault of the guy in the Oval Office. It is the guys in the high rise office buildings who right now are worried for their lives that some angry mob will try to harm them because they now have more than anybody else because they have take more than they deserve.
The TEA Party is misguided or they are misguiding. They are standing up for the rich minority either because they are the rich minority or they are to ignorant to realize they are supporting their oppressors. You will find that many of the TEA Party supporters still are employed, still are better off than the majority of this country that is suffering, and rarely–if in any case–part of or wish to identify themselves as part of the 10.2% that is unemployed.
You will not go to jail for not buying health insurance or using public healthcare. The country is not headed towards communism, it is headed toward oligarchy, to which to stave off the oligarchs, social programs need to be reinstated or installed.
America is hungry for the change that they asked for, and the president wants to deliver, but it is the status quo that continues to deny the things that we have worked hard for.
Iran’s Freedom Revolution wouldn’t be a “revolution” if the West got involved
On Friday, the U.S. House of Representatives voted 405-1 on a resolution recoginizing the Iranian Freedom Revolution. The only person voting against it was Libertarian Ron Paul (R-TX), and I think we know how his “REVOLution” ended out. (As much as I don’t agree with the Libertarian Party’s beliefs, they certainly aren’t domestic terrorists. Imagine if the Republican party were still in power in Washington, Democratic supporters would have probably been also profiled based upon such ludicrous allegations! On the other hand, Libertarians may want to thank Ron Paul for making them look bad.)
Though both sides of the aisle threw in their support for this resolution, the Republicans are critizing Obama’s neutrality. Sure, we could repeat being active in Iran the same way we were in Iraq, but that would be foolish.
Secondly, it wouldn’t be a “revolution” if outside forces got involved. Which is a good thing since Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (man his name is hard to spell!)

"Mahmoud Ah-ma...Ah-mad...Ah-ma-not going to be president of Iran anymore we hope."
is not happy that the West isn’t backing him up.
Clearly, what goes around comes around. When Ahmadinejad took power he clearly didn’t want to have anything to do with the West. Just to piss everyone off (for the LULZ), he decided to deny the Holocaust. He could be standing in the ruins of a Nazi concetration camp and still say “nothing happened here”.
But when the West starts talking about him, he gets all cranky. Sound like anyone we know?
Of course, now the tables have turned. Now he is looking for someone to back him up and support him. ORLY?
But because people like Barack Obama and much of Europe have told Ahmadinejad that he’s on his own, it is a perfect punishment for someone who was so anti-Western.
The best thing that we (America) can do IS nothing. Sure, Twitter can claim that it is helping by doing maintenance at 5PM Eastern Time. And the protests against the election may be starting to fizzle out, but there are always three ways to approach a problem:
- Aggressively – When a problem is approached with aggression, force is used. Sometimes, the aggressor may say they are doing it to liberate their opponent, which from what we have learned from the Iraq War is a bunch of bullsh*t. The aggressor loses in the long run as he now has to fight off a tenacious resisting force. The aggressor may lose all their allies, which means diplomacy (see next point) will be needed to regain their trust.
- Diplomaticly – When a problem is approached with diplomacy, peace is used. In diplomacy, compromises are made. Generally, both sides lose because they give up strengths that make them strong and which they use to identify themselves individually. Most diplomacy is used to create “free trade” between countries, which although profitable, can be harmful to the middle and working classes.
- Neutrally – When a problem is approached with neutrality, it may seem like doing nothing or sitting on the fence. But the truth is, in a neutral state, one must be able to listen, make observations and take notes. Neutrality does not mean to give up, but to hold your ground. Through careful observation, the neutral party is able to defeat their opponent most effectively by recognizing their opponent’s weaknesses. This neutrality also alows for the neutral party to learn about its own weaknesses and find ways to turn those weaknesses into strengths. Sometimes, a neutral force may need to go into seclusion until the time is right for them to return in order to recover their power, especially if their opponents decide to persecute or punish dissent.
If Iranian people wish to gain freedom from Ahmadinejad and the ayatollahs they need to step back.
It should be noted that technology is ultimately a luxury. Even this blog is a form of technology. It could be monitored, deleted, or censored for whatever reason, even in a country like the United States. Communication technology in Iran has made headlines, but because of tight controls and restrictions, it has made protesting to remove Ahmadinejad about as easy as having a root canal without novacaine. As great as technology is, it can be cumbersome if you are trying to take down a regime which although uses faith as a way to convice people not to question authority, has secular economic interests with large energy conglomorates.
To be effective, Iranians must find a low-tech ENCRYPTED form of communication. The dependence on high tech devices, not just in Iran but worldwide, requires the need for some encryption. It is how most effective revolutions work. In a lanugage such as Farsi, where the alphabet can be used as a form of artistic calligraphy, messages could be starting them right in the face, and it would be impossible to recognize it.
The message can not be censord to appease a tiny minority with vastly abused power.
Iran’s interest in nuclear energy are unknown (which is what concerns the West the most). But wheter Iran’s use of nuclear energy is to create energy or weapons, the environment is the ultimate deciding factor. Reguardless of their ambisions, anything nuclear is a risk to the environment.
When was the last time anyone in the media published a story about Iran erecting wind turbines or solar panels? All that is swept under the rug in hopes that no one will pay attention to it.
This is the Iran everyone wants to see. Not the West-hating, nuclear-touting, fanaticly-religious state, but the Iran that wants true freedom (not this “liberation” crap Republicans want) and is willing to be a major power in the Middle East and South Asia.
The Great DINGY, DIRTY White North
It is true that the Toyota Prius is NOT a green car. In fact, during it’s production, severe environmental damage was inflicted on the local environment in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
As conservative causes move to north of the Border from the mining of oil sand and mountain top removal in Alberta, to nickel smelting polution in Ontario being used to test moon rovers for NASA caused by a factory so large it is called “The Superstack”, we are starting to see a dingy (din-jee) Great White North.
The industrialists have taken their business north and south, as American health and environmental laws that had been ignored for so long suddenly become serious. (I can’t believe the press and government officials are acting so flabbergasted as to how quickly the Obama adminstration managed to take care of the creating a budget. They were hoping it would would take him five years…it took him less than five months thanks to these things called COMPUTERS. Something that Clinton nor even either Bush bothered to use. Of course, a little planning a head during the campaign or even before that probaby helped.)
You can tell that it is OUR G.O.P. wearing the tuque and trading in their Starbucks for Tim Hortons because when Bush was president, there was this pressing issue to activate Columbian Free-Trade (nothing “free” about it) with North America. Being the astute little patriotic disident that I was, I noticed that when Bush wanted this passed, there was propaganda on American government websites demanding Congress pass similar legislation (which thankfully did not). It was propoganda because during some exploration to Cuban website (sites ending in .cu), there was pleanty of propaganda demainding the United States return five Cuban fugitives being held in Texas.
It is clear that under any neoconservative or far-right leaning regeme we become like our rivals. Rather than being better than our rivals and not stoop to their level, the Bush Adminstration posted this Columbian Trade nonsense even on websites for the Environmental Protection Agency and NOAA. Why scientific agencies got involved was clearly the work of a higher authority.

The real reason why Columbia Trade is an issue in any country. The Drugs!
Clearly, the Bush Adminstration had no reguard for the environment let alone the economy. It was clear when a family in Colorado turned on the water in their kitchen to find methane drilling near their home had caused methane to seep into their drinking water made the water catch on fire due to drilling near their home. Why a disaster FORTY TIMES WORSE than the Exxon-Valdez dumped over 70 million cubic feet of coal sludge in eastern Tennessee last year. It is why natural gas drilling is causing earthquakes in Texas that Gas Companies hope a royality check for damaging the geology will make residents feel better for making the earth unstable. But why burn down the house, when you can start a FIRE in the basement and cause a global pandemic.
Canada has drawn many industrialist to strip her of her resources, take advantage of her immigration policies by trafficing “outsourced labor” (which as the Kansas City Star discovered it to include “modern day slavery”) and narcotics, polluting and destroying the image of Canada being a pristine environment, and hoping that there will be pleanty of laws to make sure that their brief high-flying druged-up weathy lifestyle continues despite their breif time on earth.

Your average industrialist: Loves making money, long walks on oil covered beaches, feeding stray kittens to ATM machines, shooting friends with no remorse, cocaine, and ruling the free world as Vice President with an iron fist. (See also Dick Cheney.)
But how did the Prius fit into all this? Think of it as the backdoor plan for anyone who was not interested in buying a Hummer.
We have been living in a world of extremes, not moderates. These forces were separated and pulled out of balance. The polarization of the world that turns neighbors into enemies. A plan not to develop the future but to destroy the present to relive the past.
Their influence has set off the development of clean cars that are dirty, unaware that the fair trade of scientific ideas will change a car that is suppost to look like it is green into one that truely is without harming the environment or looking like the fugliest car on the road.

"Unless"
The way of the industrialist is terse, closed, and creates boundries that limit the mind and the imagination. It is easy for their world to come crashing down. The bank may collapse. The oil derick may run dry. And the factories may shut down. Unless industrialists can find moderation rather than forcing extremes, they will lose everything. No money, no religion, no power will save them or reenforce their their power. For all of that is but an instant in time, but the damage from the methods they want to use lasts forever.
Callaway County Nuclear Plant Bill Nuked!
After spouting off untruths like “Greenpeace [rather Patrick Moore who was kicked out of Greenpeace] approves of nuclear power” and “Nuclear Power is renewable energy”, the State Capitol killed the Missouri Clean and Renewable Energy Construction Act.
First off, nuclear power is NOT a renewable source of energy. It can be advertised as an “alternative” to coal, oil, or natural gas, but it is certainly NOT renewable.
Secondly, nuclear power is NOT clean energy. Aside from the waste produced by nuclear reactors, there is the radiation. Science tells us that pretty much everything is radioactive to a certain degree. The human body produces radiation but at very low levels. This non-ionizing radiation is given off as body heat. But the radiation given off by enriched uranium, a common fuel used in nuclear reactors, is poisionous due to the ionizing radiation released the various isotopes. So much so that when it is handle, it is packaged in layers of concrete. Until there is some way to scrub out the radiation, be it from peaceful usage of nuclear power or the horrors of nuclear weapons, nuclear material will remain the most dirty form of energy next to coal.
Finally, nuclear power is NOT green energy. There is nothing “green” about radioactive waste. The tranportation of it is also not green. While it chance that the truck carrying it to the waste being stollen or in an accident are very low, the waste still has to be packed up in concrete again and transported to someplace underground where it could seep into a water table. It also takes many years for some of the leftover isotopes to decay. Many of the half-lifes of the most hazardous elements have half-lifes that are couted in centuries. Most garbage in a common landfill would decay many times over compared to the waste. Even the concrete that contains them would crumble before the waste decays.
But business men do not understand that. All they see is a way to make money over a relatively short amount of time.
In recent months, we have seen the work of their ilk, even watch as some of them die off from thier addiction to greed. I’ll admit, I’d like to be rich some day, but at a much slower rate.
Unless you are willing to pay the burdens of higher taxes that come with the luxtury of a higher income, what is there to complain about?
These $400,000 per year executives moaning over a 33% income tax by the federal government have no reason to complan, especially since the math is in their favor. 33% of $400,000 is $132,000 in taxes. Keep in mind they still have 66% of that $400,000 to keep. Which is $264,000 to do whatever the heck they want. More than likely, have of that will go into investments that still make them money. Still, that is $132,000 of money they can still spend annually, while if for some instance they put the other half of that $132,000 in an Investment Savings Account with a rate of 0.15%, it would take atleast 7 years for them to make a million dollars in comparison to a person making $40,000 per year, who is taxed 10% (leaving them with $36,000 depositing half of that into savings each year) it would take 53 years. For someone making $100,000 being taxed 25%, it would take 26 years. Of course, these figures don’t account for pay raises or other stuff taken out of a paycheck.
Overall, they’re living a pretty good life. So what do they have to be unhappy about? Not enough sand near their vacation house in the Hamptons?
It’s one thing to write out one of those giant checks to a foundation, it is another to go out of your way and actually do something good for others.
What good is it being rich when you don’t do anything to help those who aren’t. I don’t mean work at a soup kitchen. If you’re running a energy company and are making even in your sleep, why aren’t you investing in affordable RENEWABLE energy, of which you can make more money since the system pays for itself when properly maintained?
There are people who have been laid off in Grantie City and Ameren wants to build a nuclear plant? Why don’t they build it out of steel made in India and anger hundreds of steel workers while they are at it?
Ameren will attempt to sneak this bill in again, just wait and see.
And if that doesn’t work, they will attempt to make it appear like we are running out of energy by imposing rolling blackouts for a power shortage that does not exist. Didn’t someone else try doing that? *cough*Enron*cough*
We don’t need a bill to change the rules. We need a bill that creates REAL renewable energy and creates new jobs in an area that need it.
Activism
Android
Blogroll
Flash
Geekiness
Linux
Local Shopping
Programming
Science
Shop
Software
St. Louis
- Alton Telegraph
- Amighetti's
- Belleville News-Democrat
- Bits and Pieces
- Central Newsmagazine
- El Mundo Latino (The Latin World)
- FloValley News
- KDHX
- KWMU
- Ladue News
- Metromix St. Louis
- Mid Rivers Newsmagazine
- Pantera's Pizza
- Playback STL
- PubDef.net
- Red Latina (Latin Network)
- Riverfront Times
- South County Times
- St. Louis American
- St. Louis Chinese American News
- St. Louis Indymedia
- St. Louis Magazine
- St. Louis Post-Dispatch
- St. Louis Review
- STLBloggers.com
- ToastedRav.com
- Urban Review STL
- Webster-Kirkwood Times
- West Newsmagazine
- Yelp: St. Louis
Writing
Pages
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jul | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |||
Categories
- actionscript
- Activism
- agriculture
- Android
- audio
- Augmented Reality
- autos
- bash
- Blog
- books
- Business
- C++
- capitalism
- cellphones
- censorship
- codebreaking
- comics
- computers
- consumerism
- cooking
- corporate greed
- crime
- critique
- diy
- drizzle
- economy
- Electronics
- employment
- energy
- environment
- Flash
- flex
- Follow up
- Free Software List
- garden
- geek
- graphics
- green
- greenwashing
- hackers
- hackerspaces
- hardware
- health
- healthcare
- Internet
- irc
- java
- Linux
- Local
- maps
- mass transit
- mathematics
- media
- MediaWiki
- Metro
- Missouri
- MrHacks.com
- music
- MySQL
- net neutrality
- news
- Orwellian Calendar
- Palm
- peripherals
- PHP
- politics
- product review
- Programming
- Projects
- Python
- Safety
- Saint Charles County
- Saint Louis City
- Saint Louis County
- satire
- security
- Skype
- socialism
- Software
- sports
- ssh
- Surveillance Cameras
- Tcl
- techcos
- telecom
- This site
- tourism
- trusted computing
- Tutorials
- Uncategorized
- unions
- Vim
- Windows
- Writing