motorola

A short list of technologies you could be using right now if it weren’t for the Apple Fanboys

It is no secret that I love my Motorola Droid, and that the number of Apple Fanboys out there will rebuke anything that is better than any iProduct because it doesn’t bear the Apple logo on it.

So, while the Fanboys bask in the glow of their latest underachieving iProduct (the iPad), here are a list of things that would be really cool right now that would be sold in the American market if Steve Jobs didn’t use the What’s New section of Popular Science magazine as toilet paper.

Despite my objections to devices such as the Amazon Kindle and Barnes and Noble Nook, these devices, can and will appeal to consumers more than any iProduct. The only improvement that would significantly defeat Apple from killing these devices is if some sort of Indiglo or Illuminator electroluminescent background were embedded into the background.

Other technologies such as electrowetting and rollability could be used.

Later this year, Lumus will release Lumusvision, a translucent head-mounted display (HMD) that sheds most of the stigmas that the Virtual Reality trend of the 1990s of the big, bulky, ugly, heavy, and geeky HMDs. While the HMD currently featured on the Lumus website still looks rather geeky, this can be modified, especially if a few eyeglass designers get involved.

Another thing iProduct Fanboys will not see is Flash. That $500 used to buy an iPad could have been better spent on an HP or Dell netbook or Tablet PC and still be able to watch videos on YouTube, run more than one application, and connect their USB devices to their computer.

Finally, as computing devices become smaller and more energy efficient, I strongly advocate adding some portable alternative energy system be embedded into the device to increase time between charges. Even if you don’t live in a high solar area, you can still power your device while it is hibernating during the day or running. The reason photovoltaic systems are not endorsed is because people expect a small panel to power a bunch of large industrial factories. Solar has been, and always will be, designed for the small scale unless there is a way to gather more photons but more importantly boost the current in a system.

The real problem with solar panels isn’t due to the lack of direct sunlight (which indirect light could work on some systems) or low voltage (solar panels can generate a good amount of voltage), but the low electrical current. A dilemma that I am personally trying to figure out.

As proof that solar can be a viable alternative for small scale electronics and devices such as netbooks, I’m going to attempt to try developing a system where I can reduce my energy consumption, increase my independence, and optimize performance.

Tags: , , , , ,

Droid Does Quite Well

Generally when I write my critiques, I have an unconventional way of writing them. I like to point out the faults and grevances first before pointing out the praise, features, and benefits. This way, when someone finishes reading the article they can think postively about the thing that I wrote about. This can work the opposite way if you list the postive first and the negative second.

I’ve had my Motorola Droid for nearly a week now. Though it is a good phone it is not without grevances.

First, there is the grevances with Verizon. The usage of mail in rebates is so last century. The fact that I have to pay an extra $100 to get that $100 back is BS. The concept of the rebate system seems to be on the idea that people are lazy and that they will not take the effort to photocopy a sales recept (easily done at the workplace, local library, Kinkos, or if you are lucky to have an open top printer/scanner). I certainly wasn’t going to go to Sam’s to pay $184 for a $199 phone that is worth paying an extra $8 for an insurance policy. It also would have been nice if Verizon would have created a printout of what the bill would look like. Though service will likely be near $100/month, there are a few things that can be done to reduce the cost of service. When I find out, I’ll be sure to write about it.

Next, their is the grevances with Motorola. I was suprised to here that the Droid was Motorola’s Hail Mary Pass in that hearing things like Motorola has been putting out some bad phones over the years. The Droid is a good phone….but Motorola wasn’t truthful in reporting the SAR rating of the phone. While Motorola told the FCC that it had an SAR rating of 0.89 W/kg (body) and 1.10 W/kg (head), the manual for the Droid has different values. Like 1.5 W/kg (body) and 1.49 W/kg (head). Of course, it is not like there is someone who keeps track of these things, right? On the other hand, I did disable the GPS on the phone, which probably explains why I don’t need to recharge the thing every four hours. GPS is a nice feature to work with mapping applications, but it can be a real battery drainer and privacy invader.

Which brings me to the final set of grevances that I have with Google. Google has played a big part in the Android Operating system development. It was kind of a let down that the applications I though Google had availble to use Google’s services weren’t there, or were so much better if used in the Internet browser than on the phone. Sure, you have Google Maps (which is good), Google Calendar (also good), and Gmail (which could use an upgrade), but Google does not have any applications for Tasks, Notes, or Docs. These applications are available for iPhone from Google, but Android users, no matter which phone you are using, will need to go to the Internet for that.

Seeing as how the Android operating system now brings Google applications to a mobile device, one can’t help but wonder if the guy at Google who decided to discontinue Google Notebook isn’t kicking himself right now. Notebook would have been a great app for Android, and the fact that it was discontinued is a foolish mistake. It would be like Microsoft removing Notepad because you have Word. Hopefully, someone will reinstate this service so that moble users can jot down notes.

The Android Market deserves both praise and criticism.

If anyone is not aware of the Anonymous hacker group, you should probably know that these guys mean business even in their quirky unorthodox ways. Anonymous is fickle. To either laud or jeer them would be hazardous to one’s online reputation. However, I find their motives of dealing soundboards in the Android Market (under the guise of “Onymous Heroes”) to be conspicuous. While it is great that the Android has many free appications to try out (although It would be nice to see a few more from Google and the Android group), the fact that one of the most stand-alone-complex group might not be so obvious to many users is a little concerning but at the same time a reminder that not everyone is creating programs in the Market (or App Store for that matter) with good intentions. That is, other groups (not like Anonymous) could have their own applications on the market to do some bad things. It is sort of like a reminder by them to say “hey watch your back” or taking advice from a theif on how to better safeguard your home from intrusion. On the other hand, the fact that no one is really keeping an eye on the Market to weed out programs that can be potential secuirty threats should make Android users wary of who the download their software from.

Reguardless, I do have plans on writing many reviews in the future about Android Apps. I would also like to develop some of them. I probably should put more effort into writing things in Java, to which that is what brings me to the upside of this review.

The Android operating system is Linux based, but many of the programs are written in Java. Perhaps I had alot of bad experiences with Java (as I don’t even use Java when browsing the Internet as the processes will keep on running), but the performance of Java on the Android is remarkable! Back when I had a Motorola RAZR, Java was unplesant. Palm couldn’t use Java work a dan on the Treo. But Android, has pretty much saved Java from being just another legacy language. Android doesn’t use the Java 2 SE or ME standards, which probably explains why Android programs are so fluid.

As stated earlier, the security flaws of the Android operating system is not with the operating sysetem itself, but with programs from some shady individuals selling their wares on the Market. However, there are gems among the junk. Where Palm Treo didn’t have the random number generation to develop a proper encryption key to run things like SSH and IRC (or battery life), the Android operating system does. Security is also one of the main goals of the Android operating system. If anything bad happens to the phone because of a program, Google will know about it. So basically, security is very good on the phone.

The Droid has a beautiful and sharp 16:9 screen. Despite the criticism by many critics about the camera, I think they seem to forget that the camera has two flashes on it. And why is everyone complaining about the 5 megapixel camera? Sure, you have to hold down the picture button to take a photo, but 5 megapixels is a sharp good of not great quality camera. (Perhaps my review of digital cameras is short sighted, then again, I don’t exactly have $700 at the moment to go out and buy the latest Nikon camera on the market. So in my opinion, 5 MP is good.)

Another thing the critics have been ripping on is the audio. Perhaps it is the foolish assumption that because a phone has a speakerphone on it that it can be used as a radio. Well…yes and no. Like just about all other smartphones, you will need to use headphones or an audio adaptor that plugs into your car stereo or home audio equipment. With a 3.5mm headphone jack, any set of headphones can be plugged into the Droid. The iPhone, much like my previous phone which was a Palm Treo, does not have a 3.5mm headphone jack. Instead, iPhone users need to use an adaptor, which in my previous experience of using audio adaptors for headphones, is an unplesant experience as it makes listening to music impossible afte a while. The Droid, like its competitor the Palm Pre, has a 3.5mm jack as opposed with the G1 that has no jack (USB audio only has one purpose: SKYPE!).

Droid does streaming audio much like the iPhone. If there is one Application I can recommend right now, it is imeem Moble. Streaming audio has evolved over the years. Just remember when you do streaming audido, do it where you can get WiFi. Otherwise, don’t forget to bring your music collection with you. (Remember: “unlimited” on the 3G network, no matter which telecom you use, means 5GB.)

So to call the iPhone better because “it has 100,000 apps” and that “it is more popular” is clearly a sign that the critics are not interested in what is new or what is better, just what is cool. Remember that next time when you try to listen to music on your iPhone but can’t because your headphones sound awful because you need to use an adaptor. Remember that when you can’t swap batteries, run multiple applications, take night shots with the camera, or make a phonecall without having to deal with the Jack-In-The-Box-speaker-quality sound.

The Droid Does but Android still needs development.

Tags: , , , ,

Isn’t it about time the Cellphone industry do something about radiation exposure?

I’m really looking forward to getting a new phone next month. But the recent news about cell phone radiation is proving to be a big downer.

Clearly, studies are necessary into making sure that cell phones are safe. As radiation (be it non-ionizing (safe in low amounts) or ionizing (not safe, and not emitted by cellphones)) is a considerable health risk.

What we do know is that non-ionizing radiation is safe under certain conditions. (The biggest problem being heat, which can be control by reducing the resistance in a system.) Radio transmitters, like the ones the broadcasting industry uses for radio and television broadcasts, are safe and have not had the controversy that cellphones have had. Had the radio towers been deemed unsafe, we would have seen birds and other wild life disappear a long time ago. However, I still wake up in the morning to the sound of cardinals chirping outside my window less than a mile from a radio tower. Thus, because the radio tower is safe, we can assume that the broadcasting towers for cellular networks are indeed safe. The only complains about the towers have been from people who claim them to be eyesorse, which they can be if placed in certain areas.

The problem for the most part has not been the towers, but the cellphones themselves.

One of the siginficant contributing factors to increased radiation exposure is the continued usage of older, more radiating technology. However, this is not exactly true as a Motorola RAZR V3 has an Specific Absorption Rate of 0.89 W/kg. The Droid, according to information submitted by Motorola to the FCC, has a head rate of about 1.10 W/kg and a hip rate of 0.89 W/kg.

Anything near the maximum limit of 1.6 W/kg would be bad. Thus, according to a list compiled by CNet, the past couple of years were unkind to Moto users as the Chicago-based manufacturer released some terrible phones the past couple of years, including one phone that nearly exceded federal SAR limits.

While the mainstream media reports that “cellphone radiation causes cancer” (to which WebMD posted a story about how putting a cellphone near your hip is bad (having never read the documentation about hip rates) and some other guy claimes that cell phones AND clock radios are a “catalyists to cancer” (clock radios? Unlikely!), even after I tracked down the the source that states that excessive cellphone usage could lead to an increase in cancer risks. On the other hand, the other report hasn’t come out yet but the media has already jumped the gun.

To make sure that we don’t have the problem of possible fearmongering by the media or an actually serious health risk that is credible by several health organizations, the cell phone industry must strive to develop devices with low SAR rates.

It should be noted at that any product that advertises itself as a way to “protect you against getting brain cancer” will actually do more harm that good. Think of it as what happens when you wear a hat in the winter. Instead of letting your body heat escape through your head, it keeps it in. Thus the same concept is applied to just about any product that promises to decrease the risk when it actually increases it.

Cellphones are a tool used daily by people. The biggest let down would be if cellphone turned out to be deadlier than ciggarettes. (Which is VERY unlikely despite media groups like Fox News publishing such false information. (And they wonder why people call them Fixed Noise!))

If cellphones cause cancer, then I want to see the published reports that say that computers, regular FM/AM radios and and satellite receivers cause cancer.

If anything, you are more likely to die in a car accident while using a cell phone than getting cancer from a cellphone.

Tags: , , , , ,

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009 cellphones, health, techcos, telecom No Comments

Motorola Droid: OH GOD! YES!

If you’ve been living under a rock the past couple of months, Verizon has been taking shots at AT&T.

Despite my past complaints about Verzions brash behavior with customers, they now have in their posession the next big thing. So much so, that tonight I saw a commercial for the the Motorola Droid.

Verizon and Motorola have it out for AT&T and Apple! Motorola has the upperhand with successes like the MOTORAZR, which most of my family still uses after all these years! They are selling their phones to just about every provider, and have recently got on board with distributing phones with the Android operating system.

November bodes well for Motorola, with the release of the Motorola Blur for T-Mobile and the Droid (a.k.a. Scholes) with Verizion. The difference between the Blur and the Droid is that Droid will have Android v2.0 and is speculated to be less locked up that the T-Moble Android phones–something that has irked Android developers.

However, the FCC is has not yet gotten with the program, as CNET’s Kent German is reporting that the GSM (old technology) version of the Droid has been approved by the FCC but not the CDMA (new techonology) version. This is expected to change in the near future.

One advantage this time is that the FCC has a tech-friendly FCC chairman especially since there are people so audacious and willing to stand up against “those evil Silicon Vally corporations that make millions because of net neutrality” (*cough*Comcast!*cough*AT&T*cough*). The NCTA commerical demonizing the tech companies was like having the oil industry telling you that the environmental activists are making billions of dollars of of protecting the environment from the oil industries envriornmental destruction. If saving the environment from the oil industry (especially since they do the most damage) is wrong, I don’t want to be right! (Save the Internet!)

Anyway, hopefully the Droid with its “netbook level of computing power” won’t put out as much radation as the T-Mobile/HTC Touch.

We now await November with open arms in the anticipation of triple threat Verizon/Motorola/Android iPhone killer.

Tags: , , ,

Sunday, October 18th, 2009 Android, Linux, telecom No Comments
September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jul    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930